Which statement about Public Offering Statements in timeshare sales is true?

The statement that the warning message must be printed in RED is accurate because regulations surrounding timeshare sales are designed to protect consumers by ensuring they are fully aware of the risks and commitments associated with time-sharing. By mandating that the warning message appears in red, it ensures heightened visibility and draws attention to important consumer information. This requirement is part of the broader aim to highlight critical details within Public Offering Statements, making it less likely that potential buyers will overlook these important disclosures.

In contrast, the other options do not align with regulatory standards. For instance, the notion that the warning message can be in any color undermines the purpose of ensuring it stands out for easy identification. Suggesting that the Public Offering Statement is optional misrepresents its necessity, as it is legally required to inform prospective buyers about their rights, the nature of the timeshare, and the terms involved. Furthermore, providing the statement post-sale contradicts the intent of initial consumer protection measures, as buyers need access to this information before making a purchase decision. Hence, the requirement for the warning message to be printed in red is a critical aspect of compliance in timeshare sales.