Which statement is NOT true regarding the informal meeting scheduled by the administrator?

The statement regarding the need for a judge or constable to be present for an informal meeting scheduled by the administrator is not true. Informal meetings are typically meant to provide a less formal setting to discuss relevant matters without the same strict procedural requirements that govern formal hearings. The purpose of these informal meetings is often to facilitate open communication and problem-solving among the parties involved.

In contrast, matters discussed in these informal meetings can indeed be considered in formal hearings, which highlights how they can play a role in the overall regulatory process. Furthermore, it is permissible to record these meetings, allowing for better documentation, which can be beneficial for transparency and accountability. Lastly, the legality of these informal meetings under NRS 119A affirms that they are a recognized part of the legislative framework guiding timeshare practices. Thus, the requirement for a judge or constable to be present does not apply in this context, making that statement the one that is not true.